Screener
RXI vs CHIQ
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- RXI costs 0.26% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RXI | CHIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $268M | $148M |
| Since | 2006 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | -16.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | -8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 22.72% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -67.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RXI and CHIQ
Explore further