Screener
RYLD vs BITS
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
Key differences
- RYLD costs 0.05% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RYLD is classified as alternative, while BITS is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- RYLD follows a option income strategy; BITS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BITS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLD | BITS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $29M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 11.85% | 22.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +53.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.82% | 52.75% |
| Max drawdown | -41.52% | -83.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RYLD and BITS
Explore further