Screener
RZG vs KAUG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- RZG costs 0.44% less per year.
- RZG is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RZG follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZG | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $80M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.58% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZG and KAUG
Explore further