Screener
RZG vs PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.06% less per year.
- RZG is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZG | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $25M |
| Since | 2006 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.58% | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZG and PSCF
Explore further