Screener
SAA vs SDD
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 vs ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
Key differences
- SAA is significantly larger than SDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAA follows a leveraged strategy; SDD uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SAA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAA | SDD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $2M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 6.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +61.7% | -42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | -25.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | -15.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.13% | 36.23% |
| Max drawdown | -74.53% | -96.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAA and SDD
Explore further