Screener
SAA vs TWM
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 vs ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
Key differences
- SAA follows a leveraged strategy; TWM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SAA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAA | TWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $47M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 5.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +61.7% | -52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | -31.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | -18.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | -0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.13% | 38.52% |
| Max drawdown | -74.53% | -96.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAA and TWM
Explore further