Screener
SAGP vs XNAV
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- SAGP costs 0.62% less per year.
- SAGP is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $31M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and XNAV
Explore further