Screener
SARK vs BIBL
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.57% less per year.
- BIBL is significantly larger than SARK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SARK follows a inverse strategy; BIBL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SARK | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.92% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $68M | $436M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.91% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -37.8% | +38.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -32.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.53 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.82% | 15.37% |
| Max drawdown | -81.07% | -36.12% |
Similar to SARK and BIBL
Explore further