Screener
SCOW vs XSHQ
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XSHQ costs 0.30% less per year.
- XSHQ is significantly larger than SCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XSHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCOW | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $246M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.54% |
| Max drawdown | -10.09% | -38.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCOW and XSHQ
Explore further