Screener
SDIV vs IDVZ
Global X SuperDividend ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- SDIV costs 0.17% less per year.
- SDIV is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SDIV follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
- SDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SDIV | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $155M |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 8.82% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -56.91% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SDIV and IDVZ
Explore further