Screener
SECT vs BCHP
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
Key differences
- BCHP costs 0.11% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than BCHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT covers north america markets; BCHP covers global.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; BCHP uses index tracking.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | BCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $223M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 15.82% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -18.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and BCHP
Explore further