Screener
SECT vs BFLX
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.29% less per year.
- SECT covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | — |
| Since | 2017 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -0.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and BFLX
Explore further