Screener
SECT vs BELT
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- SECT costs 0.06% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; BELT uses index enhanced.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | BELT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $9M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -23.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and BELT
Explore further