Screener
SECT vs DYNF
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.43% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than SECT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DYNF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $34.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and DYNF
Explore further