Screener
SECT vs FUSI
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
Key differences
- FUSI costs 0.42% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than FUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while FUSI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; FUSI uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | FUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $23M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 5.44% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 2.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 0.91% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -0.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and FUSI
Explore further