Screener
SECT vs PGF
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGF costs 0.14% less per year.
- SECT is significantly larger than PGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SECT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $719M |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and PGF
Explore further