Screener
SECT vs SAMT
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SECT is significantly larger than SAMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SECT is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SECT follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECT | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $619M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -38.09% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECT and SAMT
Explore further