Screener
SECU vs MEAR
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.14% less per year.
- SECU is classified as alternative, while MEAR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SECU follows a multi strategy strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- SECU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SECU | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $592M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2005 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -1.76% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SECU and MEAR
Explore further