Screener
SEEM vs EMSF
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
Key differences
- SEEM costs 0.19% less per year.
- SEEM is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SEEM | EMSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $535M | $44M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 5.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +51.7% | +64.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.46% | 24.21% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SEEM and EMSF
Explore further