Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMSF vs SCHE

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

EMSF

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$44M

SCHE

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$12.3B

Key differences

  • SCHE costs 0.72% less per year.
  • SCHE is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMSF follows a active selection strategy; SCHE uses index tracking.
  • SCHE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMSFSCHE
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.07%
Fund size (AUM)$44M$12.3B
Since20232010
Dividend yield5.21%2.67%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+64.8%+26.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+17.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+5.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.84
Volatility 1Y24.21%16.11%
Max drawdown-24.75%-36.16%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMSF and SCHE