Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SEF vs SMN

ProShares Short Financials vs ProShares UltraShort Materials

SEF

ProShares Short Financials

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$18M

SMN

ProShares UltraShort Materials

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$3M

Key differences

  • SEF is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SEFSMN
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$18M$3M
Since20082007
Dividend yield3.44%4.58%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y+0.6%-31.2%
CAGR 3Y-10.8%-16.8%
CAGR 5Y-6.1%-14.9%
Sharpe 3Y-0.86-0.46
Volatility 1Y14.40%34.14%
Max drawdown-75.66%-95.39%

Similar to SEF and SMN