Screener
SMN vs SKF
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs ProShares UltraShort Financials
Key differences
- SKF is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | SKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $16M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | -4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | -25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.9% | -16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | -0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.14% | 28.99% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -96.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMN and SKF
Explore further