Screener
SEPI vs MAVF
Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- SEPI costs 0.21% less per year.
- SEPI is classified as alternative, while MAVF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SEPI follows a option income strategy; MAVF uses active selection.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SEPI | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $91M |
| Since | 2025 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +38.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.03% |
| Max drawdown | -7.66% | -14.87% |
Similar to SEPI and MAVF
Explore further