Screener
SETM vs REMX
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Key differences
- REMX costs 0.12% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than SETM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- REMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +165.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 47.82% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -73.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and REMX
Explore further