Screener
SETM vs REXC
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF
Key differences
- SETM is significantly larger than REXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SETM covers global markets; REXC covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | REXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $31M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -16.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and REXC
Explore further