Screener
SETM vs SGDJ
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDJ costs 0.15% less per year.
- SETM follows a index tracking strategy; SGDJ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SGDJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | SGDJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $330M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 7.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +91.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +48.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 48.45% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -59.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and SGDJ
Explore further