Screener
SGDJ vs COPP
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDJ costs 0.16% less per year.
- SGDJ follows a active selection strategy; COPP uses index tracking.
- SGDJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDJ | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $330M | $269M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 7.97% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +91.5% | +99.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 48.45% | 42.29% |
| Max drawdown | -59.27% | -44.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDJ and COPP
Explore further