Screener
SGDJ vs SIL
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDJ costs 0.15% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than SGDJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDJ follows a active selection strategy; SIL uses index tracking.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDJ | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $330M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 7.97% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +91.5% | +110.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.4% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 48.45% | 49.93% |
| Max drawdown | -59.27% | -63.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDJ and SIL
Explore further