Screener
SGDM vs COPJ
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.29% less per year.
- SGDM is significantly larger than COPJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SGDM follows a active selection strategy; COPJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, COPJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SGDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDM | COPJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $162M |
| Since | 2014 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 11.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +125.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.0% | +43.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.78% | 41.67% |
| Max drawdown | -49.69% | -32.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDM and COPJ
Explore further