Screener
SGDM vs COPP
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.20% less per year.
- SGDM follows a active selection strategy; COPP uses index tracking.
- SGDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGDM | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $660M | $269M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +99.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.78% | 42.29% |
| Max drawdown | -49.69% | -44.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGDM and COPP
Explore further