Screener
SH vs SKF
ProShares Short S&P500 vs ProShares UltraShort Financials
Key differences
- SH costs 0.06% less per year.
- SH is significantly larger than SKF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SH | SKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $16M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.2% | -4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -13.5% | -25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -9.5% | -16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.15 | -0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 28.99% |
| Max drawdown | -75.87% | -96.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SH and SKF
Explore further