Screener
SHUS vs IWL
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.64% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHUS is classified as alternative, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SHUS follows a option income strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHUS | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.16% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -14.09% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHUS and IWL
Explore further