Screener
SIL vs METL
Global X Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- SIL costs 0.34% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SIL follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIL | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $95M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +110.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.93% | — |
| Max drawdown | -63.04% | -27.39% |
Similar to SIL and METL
Explore further