Screener
SIL vs NANR
Global X Silver Miners ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.30% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SIL is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SIL covers global markets; NANR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, SIL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIL | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $795M |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +110.6% | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.8% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.93% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -63.04% | -49.15% |
Similar to SIL and NANR
Explore further