Screener
SKF vs SMN
ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares UltraShort Materials
Key differences
- SKF is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SKF | SMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $3M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 4.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.1% | -31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -25.2% | -16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.7% | -14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.85 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.99% | 34.14% |
| Max drawdown | -96.51% | -95.39% |
Similar to SKF and SMN
Explore further