Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SKF vs UYM

ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares Ultra Materials

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

UYM

ProShares Ultra Materials

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$41M

Key differences

  • SKF follows a inverse strategy; UYM uses leveraged.
  • Over the last 3 years, UYM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SKFUYM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$41M
Since20072007
Dividend yield4.31%1.21%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseleveraged
CAGR 1Y-4.1%+35.7%
CAGR 3Y-25.2%+12.6%
CAGR 5Y-16.7%+3.9%
Sharpe 3Y-0.850.41
Volatility 1Y28.99%33.86%
Max drawdown-96.51%-73.31%

Similar to SKF and UYM