Screener
SLVP vs XME
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Key differences
- XME is significantly larger than SLVP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +129.6% | +99.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +50.1% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | +21.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.87% | 34.18% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -61.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and XME
Explore further