Screener
SLYG vs GRPZ
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- SLYG costs 0.20% less per year.
- SLYG is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLYG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLYG | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $3M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 17.82% |
| Max drawdown | -41.86% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLYG and GRPZ
Explore further