Screener
SMCO vs IJK
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJK costs 0.38% less per year.
- IJK is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
- IJK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 17.02% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -39.25% |
Similar to SMCO and IJK
Explore further