Screener
SMCO vs IWP
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWP costs 0.32% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; IWP uses index tracking.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $19.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -38.62% |
Similar to SMCO and IWP
Explore further