Screener
SMCO vs FNDX
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDX costs 0.30% less per year.
- FNDX is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; FNDX uses index tracking.
- FNDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $25.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 10.20% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -37.72% |
Similar to SMCO and FNDX
Explore further