Screener
SMIZ vs IWB
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.40% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than SMIZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMIZ follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMIZ | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $258M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.00% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -25.04% | -34.60% |
Similar to SMIZ and IWB
Explore further