Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SMIZ vs SMMD

Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF

SMIZ

Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$258M

SMMD

iShares Russell 2500 ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.4B

Key differences

  • SMMD costs 0.40% less per year.
  • SMMD is significantly larger than SMIZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SMIZ follows a active selection strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
  • SMMD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SMIZSMMD
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$258M$3.4B
Since20232017
Dividend yield0.54%1.05%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+29.0%+32.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.2%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.82
Volatility 1Y17.00%17.44%
Max drawdown-25.04%-41.06%

Similar to SMIZ and SMMD