Screener
SMIZ vs IWM
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than SMIZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMIZ follows a active selection strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMIZ | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $258M | $80.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +36.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.00% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -25.04% | -41.13% |
Similar to SMIZ and IWM
Explore further