Screener
SMMU vs SUB
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.28% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than SMMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMMU follows a active selection strategy; SUB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMMU | SUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $11.1B |
| Since | 2010 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 2.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.8% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | -0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.03% | 1.01% |
| Max drawdown | -5.09% | -9.46% |
Similar to SMMU and SUB
Explore further