Screener
SMN vs ROM
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs ProShares Ultra Technology
Key differences
Both SMN and ROM are equity ETFs. SMN charges 0.95% a year and ROM 0.95%. The main difference: SMN follows a inverse strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- SMN follows a inverse strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- ROM is much larger than SMN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | ROM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.53% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -30.4% | +114.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | +54.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -15.2% | +28.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.13% | 45.31% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -67.55% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.