Screener
SMN vs XLB
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLB costs 0.87% less per year.
- XLB is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMN follows a inverse strategy; XLB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, XLB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 1.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.9% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.14% | 16.88% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -37.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMN and XLB
Explore further