Screener
SMN vs TINT
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.37% less per year.
- SMN follows a inverse strategy; TINT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TINT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $2M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 1.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | +50.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.14% | 23.73% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -41.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMN and TINT
Explore further