Screener
SMOG vs ESPO
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $257M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and ESPO
Explore further