Screener
SMOG vs ZAP
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.14% less per year.
- SMOG covers global markets; ZAP covers north america.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $456M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +35.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 14.77% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -12.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and ZAP
Explore further